7/29/2023 0 Comments Fluid image![]() ![]() Addressing height in the same declaration can reduce this issue:įinally, browsers are not always well-optimized to resizing images at quality. While each of these cycles typically take less than a millisecond, they stack up, especially if there are multiple scalable elements on the page. Specifying only the width of images may cause a doubling or tripling of the cycles that many browsers must process to layout the new, resized page. The type of approach you use will depend on both the kind of image and the overall design of the site there is also the possibility of transitioning the flexible images between breakpoints with a hybrid technique that utilizes media queries: we’ll look at that in the next article. To get around this, we can place a max and/or min width on the image in pixels as upper and lower limits: This accommodates Retina pixel-doubled images, but can run into issues at extremes of large or small viewport sizes, when the image might appear too big or small relative to the text. With this approach, the image will always remain in scale with the rest of the text:Ĭomparison of percentage width scaled image with narrowed browser window We can plug this number in as the width for the image often this would be done inline, as each image will often be a different dimension: The calculation of how much width the image takes up as a percentage of the document is easy: Below 1200px, the document will be fluid. The basic max-width fluid image approach is a very good approach for article header and “hero” images, but for illustrations in body text, a more subtle approach is often required.Ī better, albeit more complex approach to fluid images is to measure the width of the image as a percentage of the overall width of the page.įor example, let’s say you had an image that had a natural size of 500px × 300px in a 1200px wide document.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |